The 2008 State department report demonstrated the subservience of the belarusian courts to the lukashenko administration and the private interests of his inner circle, to such an extent that the "courts" in Belarus exist in name only. Salient points are: According to its constitution, belarus is a republic. In practice, however, power is concentrated in the presidency. Since his election in 1994 as president, Alexander lukashenka has consolidated his power over all institutions and undermined the rule of law through authoritarian means, manipulated elections, and arbitrary decrees. Subsequent presidential elections have not been free or fair, and the 28 September, 2008 parliamentary election failed to meet international standards. Members of security forces. Continued to commit numerous human rights abuses.
Human, rights, personal, statement
After the internationally unrecognized box november 1996 constitutional referendum, which resulted in the dissolution of Belarus' legitimate parliament and essays the centralization of power in the executive branch, lukashenko provoked a diplomatic crisis. Confiscating diplomatic residences of the us, german, British, French, Italian, and imf residences away from those missions. In addition, lukashenko used his newly centralized power to repress human rights throughout the country * Since his election in July 1994. Lukashenka has consolidated power steadily in the executive branch through authoritarian means and has dominated all branches of government. He used a non-democratic referendum in november 1996 to amend the 1994 constitution to broaden his powers and illegally extend his term in office. In 2004, he engineered a fraudulent referendum that removed term limits on the presidency. In 2006, lukashenka "won" another term in an undemocratic election. In January 2007, he further consolidated his rule through local elections that failed to meet international standards. State department Background Note: Belarus In mid-March 2008, responding to the belarusian government's raiding of independent-media offices and the arrests of "undesirable" journalists, State department spokesman sean McCormack issued a statement condemning the crackdown: "The regime of Alexander lukashenko has again shown itself. It points out inconsistencies between Belarusian law and court rulings.
30 Assessments by the United Nations, the United States and European and Euro-Atlantic organizations demonstrate belarus's disregard for human rights, the subservience of Belarusian courts to lukashenko's administration and members of lukashenko's inner circle, and the use of the belarusian judiciary as a tool for. The United Nations Human Rights council noted that the belarusian political system is "incompatible with the concept of human rights". 31 Belarus has been called "the last true remaining dictatorship in the heart of Europe" by the us secretary of State condoleezza rice. 32 Belarus is subject to us sanctions for "undermining democratic process and constituting an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States". 33 It is also subject to sanctions imposed by the european Union for human rights violations. 34 Belarus has been determined to be a habitual violator of international human rights laws and accepted norms of international behavior by the un, the us, the Organization of Security and cooperation in Europe (osce the osce parliamentary Assembly, the council of Europe, the parliamentary. As stated by the un special Rapporteur on Belarus, "it is impossible to believe that all these people proposal are wrong or biased". Department of State background Note: Belarus states: Bilateral relations cooled following the election of President lukashenka in July 1994.
The uk and eu continue to raise human rights issues with the belarusian government by way of regular eu statements, demarches by eu heads of mission in Minsk, and through international organizations including the un and osce. 25 United States edit According to the United States Department of State, as of 2016 the main human rights problems of Belarus continued to be the following: "citizens were unable to choose their government through elections; in a system bereft of checks and balances, authorities. 26 The United States is pursuing a " selective engagement " policy with the government of Belarus, limiting access by the government. Government officials at the assistant-secretary level and below and restricting. Assistance to the belarus government. 27 On, president george. Bush declared a national emergency in connection with the actions of members of the belarusian government (including lukashenko ordering sanctions against lukashenko, other members of the belarusian government and Belneftekhim for "undermining democratic process and constituting an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security. 28 Belarus, according to the cia a "republic in name, although in fact a dictatorship 29 is viewed as a rogue state by the United States and European democracies — one whose conduct is out of line with international norms of behavior, and whose regime. The us department of State repeatedly criticized the lukashenko regime, describing it as "a brutal, authoritarian dictatorship that blatantly ignores human rights and fundamental freedoms".
Human rights - wikipedia
The un special Rapporteur noted that "the opinions and assessments of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus were confirmed and fully shared by the most important European or Euro-Atlantic organizations, namely the osce, the osce parliamentary Assembly, the council. European Union edit In March 2006 the european council imposed sanctions on lukashenko and other members of the belarusian government, having "deplored the failure of the belarus authorities to meet osce commitments to democratic elections. And condemned the action of the belarus authorities. In arresting peaceful demonstrators exercising their legitimate right of free assembly to protest at the conduct of the Presidential elections." On, the council adopted restrictive measures against lukashenko, the belarusian leadership and the officials responsible for the violations of international electoral standards and international human-rights. Common Position 2006/362/cfsp provided that the economic resources of lukashenko and key belarusian officials identified for this purpose should be frozen. 22 In its 8 november 2006 Declaration the council stated that the european Union is "deeply concerned" about imprisonment of political leaders which show the "Belarusian authorities' repeated unwillingness to respect international human rights standards, especially the right to a fair trial. The european Union also expresses its concern about the denial of access of observers to the trial 23 and in its 2009 Conclusions 24 it stated: "the council deeply regrets the recent lack of significant progress in addressing its concerns about in the area of human.
A september 2006 report. By the un special Rapporteur. On Human Rights, was highly critical of the situation. This is one of many reports to cite numerous human rights violations. The situation continues to deteriorate, while the belarusian authorities continue to ignore concerns raised by the eu and others. Politically motivated arrests and detentions continue.
Officials continue to prosecute human rights activists and critical journalists on spurious charges. Legislative amendments further restricted freedom of expression by expanding the definition of extremism and by banning dissemination of certain types of information among children under the false pretense of protecting them. International observers recognized some progress during the september parliamentary elections, but called for additional reforms. — human Rights Watch World Report 2017 18 severe restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, of association and of peaceful assembly remained in place. The government continued to refuse co-operation with the un special Rapporteur on human rights in Belarus. At least four people were executed and four people were sentenced to death.
— amnesty International 2016/2017 Report 19 President Alyaksandr lukashenka secured a fifth term in the October 2015 presidential election, which failed to meet international standards, according to observers from the Organization for Security and co-operation in Europe (osce). (.) The government was rewarded for the steps it had taken to improve its still-repressive human rights situation when the european Union and the United States granted the country temporary relief from sanctions. — freedom house Freedom in the world 2016 Report 17 International criticism of human rights in Belarus edit United Nations edit The un human Rights council 2007 Report 20 notes that "the Special Rapporteur has encountered, for the third consecutive year, an absolute refusal. All efforts made to engage in constructive dialogue were fruitless "the situation of human rights in Belarus constantly deteriorated "The government of Belarus did not consider any of the recommendations made by the Special Rapporteur" and treaty bodies (such as the human Rights Committee). The un special Rapporteur noted that "the political system of Belarus seems to be incompatible with the concept of human rights" and that "the human Rights council should either call for the democratization of the political regime and a change in the political behavior. Assistance to the human rights defenders who have been politically harassed, oppressed or prosecuted "to investigate the apparent involvement of senior government officials in international organized crime and illegal arms sales, monitor the international financial cash flows of Belarus and, if necessary, freeze foreign bank.
Commentary essay on "exploring origins of ethical company/brand
— kashenko 13 In the book summer of 2013 the belarusian president said that the total surveillance and harassment of Edward Snowden by the. And the eu is a violation of human rights. 14 Alexander lukashenko was member of the communist Party of the soviet Union during the soviet occupation of Belarus but was not a member of any party ahead of his first presidential election. 15 Official award for human rights protection in Belarus edit The official Order of Friendship of people is presented for "a big personal contribution to the development and enrichment of the spiritual and intellectual potential of the republic of Belarus and commitment to protecting human. The overall purpose of the belarusian orders system is to reward "activities aimed at strengthening the power of the state and gallantry and intrepidity displayed while protecting the state". 16 Position of major human rights organizations edit major human rights organizations have been criticizing Belarus and its human rights situation. Belarus in major freedom indices Freedom in the world 5 Not free 17 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not free 5 Not. The death penalty remains in use.
It is not so easy. Leadership of these countries started to resist. And the global community understood the essence of their plan. After the events in Libya and thesis Egypt, some allies of those who try to put these countries into disorder realized that the result was different from what they expected. They understood that it was possible to negotiate with muammar Gaddafi and Hosni mubarak. It will be much more difficult to come to an agreement or even talk to those who came to power in these countries. They got a dose of their own medicine.
control in the future. Therefore, they started from the zones of influence. It was as easy as abc in Tunisia and Egypt. It was more difficult in Libya. Perhaps, you noticed that they did not disturb Jordan, Israel and others. They switched over to syria. Previously they interfered with Iraq, then Iran.
The, council of Europe has barred Belarus from membership since 1997 for undemocratic voting and election irregularities in the apple november 1996 constitutional referendum and parliament by-elections. 9, dozens of Belarusian government officials responsible for political repressions, propaganda, electoral fraud have been subject to personal sanctions by the, united States and the, european Union. Belarusian legislation and official government position on human rights edit, belarus Constitution and human rights edit The current Constitution was drafted in 1994 and amended in 19 following a series of controversial referenda which were accompanied by mass protests of the opposition, arrests of activists. The belarus Constitution centres around three key elements: 10 the regulation of rights and freedoms the establishment of a new state mechanism the reworking of new laws and a new justice system The belarus Constitution guarantees the following rights to the people of Belarus: the. According to lukashenko true dictators are Americans. 11 The head of state, during a meeting with heads of cis mass media, stated that the right to life is the most important of all human rights and bombardment of Iraq by nato forces using far-fetched allegations that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons violated. 12 This is true that there are zones of influence of powers that be in the world. Let us assume that there are zones of influence of America, the european Union.
Example law personal statement
A symbol of Belarusian opposition, this flag served as the national flag from 1991 to 1995. Human rights in, belarus have been described as "poor". 1, the belarusian essay government is criticized for human rights violations and its persecution of non-governmental organisations, independent journalists, national minorities, and opposition politicians. 2 3, in a testimony to the, united States Senate committee on Foreign Relations, former. United States Secretary of State, condoleezza rice labeled Belarus as one of the world's six " outposts of tyranny ". 4, in response, the belarusian government called the assessment "quite far from reality". As at 2017, the, viasna human Rights Centre lists two political prisoners, down from 11 in 2016 6 currently detained in Belarus. President, alexander lukashenko has described himself as having an "authoritarian ruling style". 7, western countries have described Belarus under lukashenko as a dictatorship; the government has accused the same western powers of trying to oust lukashenko.