Initially they had a much narrower idea. They were going to let hosts rent out space on their floors during conventions. They didn't foresee the expansion of this idea; it forced itself upon them gradually. All they knew at first is that they were onto something. That's probably as much as Bill Gates or Mark zuckerberg knew at first. Occasionally it's obvious from the beginning when there's a path out of the initial niche.
Good to, great, essay
But while demand shaped like a well is almost a necessary condition for a good startup idea, it's not a sufficient one. If Mark zuckerberg had built something that could only ever have appealed to harvard students, it would not have been a good startup idea. Facebook was rights a good idea because it started with a small market there was a fast path out. Colleges are similar enough that if you build a facebook that works at Harvard, it will work at any college. So you spread rapidly through all the colleges. Once you have all the college students, you get everyone else simply by letting them. Similarly for Microsoft: Basic for the Altair; Basic for other machines; other languages besides Basic; operating systems; applications; ipo. Self How do you tell whether there's a path out of an idea? How do you tell whether something is the germ of a giant company, or just a niche product? The founders of Airbnb didn't realize at first how big a market they were tapping.
Thirty years later Facebook had the same shape. Their first site was exclusively for Harvard students, of which there are only a few thousand, but those few thousand users wanted it a lot. When summary you have an idea for a startup, ask yourself: who wants this right now? Who wants this so much that they'll use it even when it's a crappy version one made by a two-person startup they've never heard of? If you can't answer that, the idea is probably bad. 3 you don't need the narrowness of the well per. It's depth you need; you get narrowness as a byproduct of optimizing for depth (and speed). But you almost always do get. In practice the link between depth and narrowness is so strong that it's a good sign when you know that an idea will appeal strongly to a specific group or type of user.
Google is an immense crater: hundreds of write millions of people use it, and they need it a lot. A startup just starting out can't expect to excavate that much volume. So you have two choices about the shape of hole you start with. You can either dig a hole that's broad but shallow, or one that's narrow and deep, like a well. Made-up startup ideas are usually of the first type. Lots of people are mildly interested in a social network for pet owners. Nearly all good startup ideas are of the second type. Microsoft was a well when they made Altair Basic. There were only a couple thousand Altair owners, but without this software they were programming in machine language.
They don't want to use it themselves, at least not right now, but they could imagine other people wanting. Sum that reaction across the entire population, and you have zero users. 2 well When a startup launches, there have to be at least some users who really need what they're making—not just people who could see themselves using it one day, but who want it urgently. Usually this initial group of users is small, for the simple reason that if there were something that large numbers of people urgently needed and that could be built with the amount of effort a startup usually puts into a version one, it would probably. Which means you have to compromise on one dimension: you can either build something a large number of people want a small amount, or something a small number of people want a large amount. Not all ideas of that type are good startup ideas, but nearly all good startup ideas are of that type. Imagine a graph whose x axis represents all the people who might want what you're making and whose y axis represents how much they want. If you invert the scale on the y axis, you can envision companies as holes.
Free, good to, great, essay
But coming up with good startup ideas is hard. It's not something you can do for the asking. So (unless they got amazingly lucky) the writers would come up with an idea that sounded plausible, but was actually bad. For example, a social network for pet owners. It doesn't sound obviously mistaken.
Millions of people have pets. Often they care a lot about their pets and spend a lot of money on them. Surely many of these people would like a site where they could talk to other pet owners. Not all of them perhaps, but if just 2 or 3 percent were regular visitors, you could have millions of users. You could serve them targeted offers, and maybe charge for premium features. The danger of an idea like this is that when peers you run it by your friends with pets, they don't say "I would never use this." They say "Yeah, maybe i could see using something like that." even when the startup launches, it will sound.
It's not how the art business works. So why did I spend 6 months working on this stupid idea? Because i didn't pay attention to users. I invented a model of the world that didn't correspond to reality, and worked from that. I didn't notice my model was wrong until I tried to convince users to pay for what we'd built. Even then I took embarrassingly long to catch.
I was attached to my model of the world, and I'd spent a lot of time on the software. They had to want it! Why do so many founders build things no one wants? Because they begin by trying to think of startup ideas. Is doubly dangerous: it doesn't merely yield few good ideas; it yields bad ideas that sound plausible enough to fool you into working on them. At yc we call these "made-up" or "sitcom" startup ideas. Imagine one of the characters on a tv show was starting a startup. The writers would have to invent something for it.
Good to great essays
The very best daddy startup ideas tend to have three things in common: they're something the founders themselves want, that they themselves can build, and that few others realize are worth doing. Microsoft, Apple, yahoo, google, and Facebook all began this way. Problems, why is it so important to work on a problem you have? Among other things, it ensures the problem really exists. It sounds obvious to say you should only work on problems that exist. And yet by far the most common mistake word startups make is to solve problems no one has. I made it myself. In 1995 I started a company to put art galleries online. But galleries didn't want to be online.
It is a person that is doing its job. Such a person can be very good in the theoretical part of his subject but he will never have students being emotionally attached to him. It is a teacher that lets his personal mood influence on the way he treats his students, ect. That cannot reduce awkward situations with humor either it is him in the situation or his student. Being a good teacher is about loving children and wanting to give them handmaid's only the best the teacher has inside of him. Want to start a startup? Get funded by, y combinator. November 2012, the way to get startup ideas is not to try to think of startup ideas. It's to look for problems, preferably problems you have yourself.
the children learn to take into account and respect the thoughts of other people. It is a man or a woman that can not play the teachers role but he in the first place a feeling human being in front of the students, a person that can show emotional response. For example, if the teacher is professionally good enough but does not take critics from the pupils constructively or does not explain why he thinks he is right this makes a huge gap between the students and the teacher. And when there is no emotional contact the learning cannot be called successful, for the students are not completely involved. When the teacher does not treat students as people that obey him, treats them like they are equal to him and explains equally to everybody it can really be a pointer of a good teacher. And one other very important thing is creativity. Conclusion: One of the indicators of a good teacher it is his desire to teach in a new, original form, adding something new and personal to make the learning process as exciting as it can possibly. A bad teacher is a person that focuses only on the information he provides not taking into account the children or anything.
Usually the term education is used meaning the great impact that parent have on the future personality of their child. But this also includes school education, because nowadays, when parents are very busy they are the people, who teach children what is beautiful and what is ugly, what is right and what is wrong. Through them children learn to perceive the inner world. And the way they perceive it depends on the teachers personal particularities that are transmitted to children through interaction and the knowledge that the teacher offers them. A good teacher is a person who finds individual approach to every pupil, taking care about the childs adaptation in database class, increasing ones social status in class and making sure the children learn to take into account and respect the thoughts of other people. Therefore there is much more to a teacher than high professionalism. What makes kids hardly wait until the lesson starts in one cases and hating the subject in others? Of course high professionalism in the field of the taught subject is very important, but when it comes to being a bad or a good teacher this is not the weightiest factor. A good teacher is a person who not just reproduces the knowledge he got.
Good to, great, essay - 340 Words
Example of a argumentative essay on, social issues about: teaching / development pdf / education / teacher, essay topic: The importance of having a good teacher as a factor of the persons potential success in life. Essay questions: Why is teaching considered to be the leading power of societys development? How many factors influence the development of the personality? How can a good teacher be defined? Thesis Statement: A good teacher is a person who finds individual approach to every pupil, taking care about the childs adaptation in class, increasing ones social status in class and making sure the children learn to take into account and respect the thoughts of other. Good and Bad teachers essay, introduction: teaching can without any doubts be called the leading power of the societys development. It is well known that there exist three main factors that influence the development of the personality. They are: heredity, social encirclement and education.