This means that it is impossible for a human being to willingly do wrong because their instinct for self interest prevents them from doing. This is an extraordinary statement that strikes disbelief in many people going all the way back to Aristotle. It seems contrary to experience that nobody knowingly does wrong. Perhaps you have personally witnessed examples of people who did wrong and seemed to know full well that their behavior was wrong. We propose that this belief of Socrates is true in a clear and simple way. It is true that people can choose to do things they know other people think are wrong.
Free personal Strengths and, weakness, essay
It could be, but it seems very unlikely. By max Maxwell and Melete, all Rights Reserved. Essay version.0, click-tap "contents" at the top to see the table of contents for this essay. A socratic view of Wrongdoing. Morality essay is a term that refers to our adherence to rules that govern human behavior on the basis of some idea of right and wrong. Although the terms moral and ethical are often interchanged, in this essay i restrict my use of the terms ethics/ethical to refer to our process of reasoning about morality. Whatever your concept of morality, it must address the human capacity to identify and choose between right and wrong and then to act accordingly. Socrates believed that nobody willingly chooses to do wrong. He maintained that doing wrong always harmed the wrongdoer and that nobody seeks to bring harm upon themselves. In this view all wrongdoing is the result of ignorance.
It may seem cavalier to dismiss a language before you've even tried writing programs. But this is something all programmers have. There are too presentation many technologies out there to learn them all. You have to learn to judge by outward signs which will be worth your time. I have likewise cavalierly dismissed Cobol, Ada, visual Basic, the ibm as400, vrml, iso 9000, the set protocol, vms, novell Netware, and corba, among others. They just smelled wrong. It could be that in java's case i'm mistaken. It could be that a language promoted by one big company to undermine another, designed by a committee for a "mainstream" audience, hyped to the skies, and beloved of the dod, happens nonetheless to be a clean, beautiful, powerful language that I would love programming.
The defense department is encouraging developers to use java. This seems to me the most damning sign of business all. The defense department does a fine (though expensive) job of defending the country, but they love plans and procedures and protocols. Their culture is the opposite of hacker culture; on questions of software they will tend to bet wrong. The last time the dod really liked a programming language, it was Ada. Bear in mind, this is not a critique of java, but a critique of its cover. I don't know java well enough to like it or dislike. This is just an explanation of why i don't find that I'm eager to learn.
Sun's business model is being undermined on two fronts. Cheap Intel processors, of the same type used in desktop machines, are now more than fast enough for servers. And Freebsd seems to be at least as good an os for servers as Solaris. Sun's advertising implies that you need Sun servers for industrial strength applications. If this were true, yahoo would be first in line to buy suns; but when I worked there, the servers were all Intel boxes running Freebsd. This bodes ill for Sun's future. If Sun runs into trouble, they could drag java down with them. The dod likes.
Weakness of, will (Stanford Encyclopedia of, philosophy)
It's designed for large organizations. Large organizations have different aims from hackers. They want languages that are (believed to be) suitable for use by large teams of mediocre programmers- languages with features that, like the speed limiters in u-haul trucks, prevent fools from doing too much damage. Hackers don't restaurant like a language that talks down to them. Hackers just want power. Historically, languages designed for large organizations (PL/i, ada) have lost, while hacker languages (c, perl) have won.
The reason: today's teenage hacker is tomorrow's cto. The wrong people like. The programmers i admire most are not, on the whole, captivated by java. Who does like java? Suits, who don't know one language from another, but know that they keep hearing about java in the press; programmers at big companies, who are amazed to find that there is something even better than C; and plug-and-chug undergrads, who are ready to like anything. These people's opinions change with every wind. Its daddy is in a pinch.
I've never heard anyone say that they loved java. People are forced to use. A lot of the people i know using java are using it because they feel they have. Either it's something they felt they had to do to get funded, or something they thought customers would want, or something they were told to do by management. These are smart people; if the technology was good, they'd have used it voluntarily. It has too many cooks.
The best programming languages have been developed by small groups. Java seems to be run by a committee. If it turns out to be a good language, it will be the first time in history that a committee has designed a good language. From what little i know about java, there seem to be a lot of protocols for doing things. Really good languages aren't like that. They let you do what you want and get out of the way. Sun now pretends that java is a grassroots, open-source language effort like perl or Python. This one just happens to be controlled by a giant company. So the language is likely to have the same drab clunkiness as anything else that comes out of a big company.
5 Powerful Rituals of, mentally Strong people
Historically, languages designed for other people to use have been bad: Cobol, pl/i, pascal, Ada,. The good languages have been those that were designed for their own creators: c, perl, Smalltalk, lisp. It has ulterior motives. Someone once said that the world would be database a better place if people only wrote books because they had something to say, rather than because they wanted to write a book. Likewise, the reason we hear about presentation java all the time is not because it has something to say about programming languages. We hear about java as part of a plan by sun to undermine microsoft. No one loves. C, perl, python, Smalltalk, and Lisp programmers love their languages.
hyped. Real standards don't have to be promoted. No one had to promote c, or Unix, or html. A real standard tends to be already established by the time most people hear about. On the hacker radar screen, perl is as big as java, or bigger, just on the strength of its own merits. In the original java white paper, gosling explicitly says java was designed not to be too difficult for programmers used. It was designed to be another C: C plus a few ideas taken from more advanced languages. Like the creators of sitcoms or junk food or package tours, java's designers were consciously designing a product for people not as smart as them.
So, just in case it does any good, let me clarify that I'm not writing here about revelation java (which I have never used) but about hacker's radar (which I have thought about a lot). The aphorism "you can't tell a book by its cover" originated in the times when books were sold in plain cardboard covers, to be bound by each purchaser according to his own taste. In those days, you couldn't tell a book by its cover. But publishing has advanced since then: present-day publishers work hard to make the cover something you can tell a book. I spend a lot of time in bookshops and I feel as if I have by now learned to understand everything publishers mean to tell me about a book, and perhaps a bit more. The time i haven't spent in bookshops i've spent mostly in front of computers, and I feel as if i've learned, to some degree, to judge technology by its cover as well. It may be just luck, but i've saved myself from a few technologies that turned out to be real stinkers. So far, java seems like a stinker. I've never written a java program, never more than glanced over reference books about it, but I have a hunch that it won't be a very successful language.
Astrud Gilberto - official Homepage
April 2001, this essay developed out of conversations i've had with several other programmers about book why java smelled suspicious. It's not a critique of java! It is a case study of hacker's radar. Over time, hackers develop a nose for good (and bad) technology. I thought it might be interesting to try and write down what made java seem suspect. Some people who've read this think it's an interesting attempt to write about something that hasn't been written about before. Others say i will get in trouble for appearing to be writing about things I don't understand.