Gale hawthorne, gale hawthorne is Katnisss friend and hunting partner. She is unsure of the feelings she has for him. President Snow, the ruthless president of Panem and antagonist in the story. Katniss and peetas coach. He was a winner of the games and a former tribute from District. He will be instrumental in Katnisss win despite his drunkenness. Cinna, she is Katnisss brilliant and talented stylist. She offers advice to katnisss encouraging her to be herself.
Summary judgment - wikipedia
Career tribute means he had trained all his life purposefully for the games. He is considered to be katnisss main competitor. He is a fierce fighter and represents the ruthless ruling hand in the system. Rue, a 12-year-old girl tribute from District. She will form a friendship and partnership with Katniss. Katniss sees her national as a young sister, Primrose (Prim). Her death will be painful for Katniss and at the same time business be an inspiration and motivation for her to fight on and beat the regime. Primrose everdeen, katnisss 12-year-old sister. Shes selected at the reaping in an unexpected sad turn of events. However, katniss volunteers to take her place in an act of selflessness. This was the first act of defiance by katniss, and what brought her to the spotlight.
She is feisty, a survivor, loyal, soft and loving person. She demonstrated her love and willingness to fight for her loved ones throughout the book; first when she volunteered to offer herself in place of her sister as the tribute and again with peeta and rue during the games. She is an inspiration and motivation to the oppressed citizens of Panem. Peeta mallerk, he is the bakers son and the second tribute from District. His feelings for Katniss will be revealed and at the same time be exploited during the games. However, it is what will make them survive and win the games. When they were younger, he would offer Katniss burnt bread because she was starving and could not afford to buy. The previous reviews and present state of their relationship will be revealed throughout the book. He is a career tribute from District 2, among the richest in Panem.
She will make new friends, enemies, inspire and give hope to many people in Panem thanks to her performance in the games. What makes the hunger games a more thrilling story is the games win or die rule. Will Katniss have the heart to kill peeta and vice versa, or will they both survive? This is the hunger Games summary of the plot. Summary, characters, the hunger games characters are interesting and exciting. Some are wonderful and nice while others are pure evil and filled with so much hate. The novel has a quite a number of characters, here is a list of 11 and the role they play in the overall plot of the story. Katniss everdeen, she is the main character and protagonist of the story.
Wikipedia: Summary style - wikipedia
The hunger Games book, summary, plot, the hunger games is a novel that unfolds in Panem, an apocalyptic world. The story is centered on a 16-year-old girl, katniss everdeen and her struggle for survival in dystopia. Each year, as business a punishment for the failed rebellion by district 13, the 12 Panem Districts are forced to pay tribute to the ruthless Capitol regime. The story begins on the day of reaping at District. A day that each district is required to offer two tributes, a boy and a girl aged 12 to 18 years to participate in the games.
This was going to be the 74th hunger games. In a twist of fate, prim Katniss 12-year-old sister is selected as one of the tributes. Having lost their father at a young age, she isnt going to let her mother lose her too as she swore always to protect them. She volunteers to take her sisters place, and together with the bakers son, peeta mellark they represent district. What follows is a series of events that will put Katniss in the spotlight both as a source of hope for the oppressed and as an enemy of the capitol. Her feelings for peeta will be exploited for the games, which are aired across all the districts.
Some cautions, remember that an essay that argues (rather than simply describes) uses summary only sparingly, to remind readers periodically of crucial points. Summary should always help build your argument. When teachers write "too much summary —more analysis needed" in the margin, generally they mean that the essay reports what you've studied rather than argues something about. Two linked problems give rise to this situation. The first is a thesis that isn't really a thesis but rather a statement of something obvious about your subject—a description. (The obvious cannot be argued.) A statement of the obvious tends to force further description, which leads to the second problem, a structure that either follows the chronology of the source text from beginning to end or simply lists examples from the source.
Neither approach builds an argument. Copyright 2000, Elizabeth Abrams, for the Writing Center at Harvard University. N resumen m in summary en resumen. Adj trial, execution, justice sumario summary sʌməri n news, plot, article, book résumé m in summary en résumé adj justice sommaire ; dismissal, trial, execution sommaire summary sʌmərɪ. Adj ( dismissal, treatment, justice ) sommario/a; ( perusal ) sbrigativo/a summary (saməri) plural summaries noun a shortened form of a statement, story etc giving only the main points. A summary of his speech was printed in the newspaper. He summarized the arguments.
Executive summary - wikipedia
Unlike some of Gardner's other "sketches this picture includes no perfectly positioned rifles, no artistically angled river, no well-posed men in father's uniform—indeed, no people at all. The photograph's composition could barely be more prosaic; the horizon slashes the picture in half, and the subject, a white colonial-style house, sits smack in the center. . Yet this straightforward, almost innocent perspective sets the viewer up for the photograph's stealthy horror. At first glance, the photograph appears to be a portrait of a house, perhaps even a poor portrait of a house; assignment in a òsketch bookó of war, one might flip right by it to the gory pictures before and after. But the terror in this photograph lies in its delayed shock, the gut-wrenching surprise when the light on the house leads the eye to the light on the fence and the viewer notices that the backyard fence is broken, and then thatthe backyard is a mess, littered with—what are those?—horses. What must have happened to topple twelve nine-hundred-pound horses, and where are the people who rode them? The viewer doesn't know, because gardner's picture doesn't tell. All we see is a house, a broken fence, twelve dead horses, and an empty sky.
It is thus best suited to descriptions of primary sources that you plan to analyze. (If you put an interpretive spin on a critical source when you initially address it, you risk distorting it in the eyes of your reader: a form of academic dishonesty.). The interpretive summary below comes from an essay examining a civil War photograph in light of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. The essayist, dara horn, knew she needed to describe the photo walden but that simply "walking through" its details would bewilder and bore her readers. So she revealed the point of her description in a pair of topic sentences (solid underline summarized the details of the photo (double underline and gave the description some interpretive "spin" (throughout). As skeptical moderns, we often have trouble accepting drawings or paintings as historical records, but we tend to believe in photographs the way that we believe in mirrors; we simply accept them as the truth. . Trossel's house, battle-field of Gettysburg, july, 1863 might therefore be viewed as evidence rather than commentary.
an essay on Whittaker Chambers, a key player in the start of the cold War, Bradley nash included four sentences summarizing the foreword to his main source, chambers's autobiography. Nash characterizes the genre and tone of the foreword in the first two sentences before swiftly describing, in the next two, the movement of its ideas: The foreword to Chambers's autobiography is written in the form of "a letter to my children." In this introduction. He initially characterizes the cold War in a more or less standard fashion, invoking the language of politics and describing the conflict as one between "Communism and Freedom." But as the foreword progresses, Chambers introduces a religious element that serves to cast the struggle between. Every essay also requires snippets of true summary along the way to "orient" readers—to introduce them to characters or critics they haven't yet met, to remind them of items they need to recall to understand your point. (The underlined phrase in the paragraph introducing Nash's summary is an example of orienting information.) True summary is also necessary to establish a context for your claims, the frame of reference you create in your introduction. An essay examining the "usable past" created by the vietnam Veterans Memorial, for example, might begin by briefly summarizing the history of the idea of a usable past, or by summarizing the view of a leading theorist on the topic. Interpretive, summary, sometimes your essays will call for interpretive summary — summary or description that simultaneously informs your reader of the content of your source and makes a point about. . Interpretive summary differs from true summary by putting a "spin" on the materials, giving the reader hints about your assessment of the source.
It gives you a record of what you've read and helps you distinguish your ideas from those of your sources. Summaries you write to prepare for an essay will generally be longer and more detailed than those you include in the essay itself. (Only when you've established your thesis will you know the elements most important to retain.) It is owl crucial to remember, though, that the purpose of an analytical essay is only partly to demonstrate that you know and can summarize the work of others. . The greater task is to showcase your ideas, your analysis of the source material. Thus all forms of summary (there are several) should be tools in your essay rather than its entirety. True, summary, true summary always concisely recaps the main point and key supporting points of an analytical source, the overall arc and most important turns of a narrative, or the main subject and key features of a visual source. True summary neither"s nor judges the source, concentrating instead on giving a fair picture. True summary may also outline past work done in a field; it sums up the history of that work as a narrative.
Summary execution - wikipedia
Early 15c., from Medieval Latin summarius "of or pertaining to the sum for or substance from Latin summa "whole, gist" (see sum ). Sense of "done promptly" is first found 1713. The noun meaning "a summary statement or account" is first recorded.1500, from Latin summarium "an epitome, abstract, summary from summa "totality, gist.". Summary is indispensable in preparing for and writing an argumentative essay. When you summarize a text (or describe visual material you distill the ideas of another source for use in your own essay. Summarizing primary sources allows you to keep track of your observations. It helps make your analysis of these sources convincing, because it is based on careful observation of fact rather than on hazy or inaccurate recollection. Summarizing critical sources is particularly useful during the research and note-taking stages of writing.